Input on boiler design

A special section just for steam engines and boilers, as without these you may as well fit a sail.
mtnman
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:44 pm
Boat Name: SL Mary Jane

Input on boiler design

Post by mtnman »

I am currently working on a 16' Thayer hull in which I am installing a Ray Hasbroucks #1 engine. The boiler, I am building from stainless steel tubing. I'm using a 7"x21" schedule 80 SS pipe with both ends welded and standing vertical(it was part of a steam system and rated at 700lbs). Then there are 5, 20' lengths of 1/2" SS tubing coiled around the lower half of the 7" pipe. Each tube will began and end in the lower half of the 7" pipe. “Water In” will be introduced to the lower side of the 7" pipe, “Sight Glass” will be on the upper half of the 7" pipe above the ½” tubing, “Steam Out” and “Safety Valve” will exit the top of the 7" pipe. “Blow Down” will exit the bottom of the 7” pipe. Propane will be the heat source. This is still in the design stage and I am looking for input. Will it work or am I going to blow myself sky-high!
User avatar
fredrosse
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 1925
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:34 am
Boat Name: Margaret S.
Location: Phila PA USA
Contact:

Re: Input on boiler design

Post by fredrosse »

The ASME Boiler Code specifically prohibits use of stainless steel for wetted parts of a power boiler. There can be exceptions to this rule, but it would be prudent for you to use materials acceptable to the Code.
mcandrew1894
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:12 am

Re: Input on boiler design

Post by mcandrew1894 »

What Fred said.....
I would start with a tried and true boiler design.


Additionally, and I know I will take heat for this....don't use propane MHO

If it leaks and collects in the bottom of the boat, your sitting in it....and your passengers too.

try wood......much safer

Dave
dhic001
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:32 am
Boat Name: S.S. Zeltic

Re: Input on boiler design

Post by dhic001 »

Why bother with the large stainles pipe, why not just build a true monotube? Simple to build, simple to steam, no hassles with code design, light in weight and very efficent.
Daniel
mtnman
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:44 pm
Boat Name: SL Mary Jane

Re: Input on boiler design

Post by mtnman »

OK, scrap the stainless idea. But I have to wonder why ASME frowns on stainless?
mcandrew1894
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:12 am

Re: Input on boiler design

Post by mcandrew1894 »

I believe its much more sensitive to stress corrosion cracking than mild steel.....

Dave
User avatar
fredrosse
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 1925
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:34 am
Boat Name: Margaret S.
Location: Phila PA USA
Contact:

Re: Input on boiler design

Post by fredrosse »

That is correct, the stainless steel is sensitive to stress corrosion cracking, and unless you have very very clean feedwater (chloride impurities measured in "parts per billion") the use of stainless steel is not allowed. Very low carbon steel is ideal for low pressure (under 600 psi) steam launch boilers, and should be used. In the USA, this is A-53 or better yet, A-106 pipe. Boiler tubes are usually A-178 material in low carbon steel.
mcandrew1894
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:12 am

Re: Input on boiler design

Post by mcandrew1894 »

fredrosse wrote:That is correct, the stainless steel is sensitive to stress corrosion cracking, and unless you have very very clean feedwater (chloride impurities measured in "parts per billion") the use of stainless steel is not allowed. Very low carbon steel is ideal for low pressure (under 600 psi) steam launch boilers, and should be used. In the USA, this is A-53 or better yet, A-106 pipe. Boiler tubes are usually A-178 material in low carbon steel.

A106 on all three drums of my boiler...schedule 80 on the steam drum and schedule 40 on the smaller mud drums......good stuff.
87gn@tahoe

Re: Input on boiler design

Post by 87gn@tahoe »

dhic001 wrote:Why bother with the large stainles pipe, why not just build a true monotube? Simple to build, simple to steam, no hassles with code design, light in weight and very efficent.
Daniel
Controls can become an issue with monotubes.
dhic001
Full Steam Ahead
Full Steam Ahead
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:32 am
Boat Name: S.S. Zeltic

Re: Input on boiler design

Post by dhic001 »

87gn@tahoe wrote: Controls can become an issue with monotubes.
Nope, been mastered here on oil fired ones, not so easy if solid fuel is used. Totally safe too, so little water in them that they can't explode, they only go fizz, believe me, I saw it happen. A friend here in New Zealand has built a number of monotubes using stainless tubing. Superb steamers, and once set up are virtually automatic steamers.
Daniel
Post Reply